IM Mashafizul Helmi (2416) vs. IM Tobias Hirneise ( 2427)
XXXII. Banicky kahanec, Round 2, 5.9.09
Analysed by Hairulov and Rybka 3
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Be2 O-O 6. Bg5 h6 7. Be3 Nbd7 8. Qd2 c5 9. d5 Kh7 10. Nf3 Qa5 11. h3 a6 12. O-O b5 13. a3 bxc4 14. Bxc4 Ne8 15. Qc2 15.Rab1 Followed by 16.Rfc1 and 17.b4 is recommend by theory 15... Rb8 16.Bd2 Qd8 17. Na4 Ne5 18. Nxe5 Bxe5 19. Rab1 19. Bc3 Is an alternative 19... Nc7 20. Ba5 Bd7 21. b4 of course 21. Bxa6 ? is blundering a piece after 21... Ra8 21... Qe8 22. Nb6 14 Bd4 23. Nxd7 Qxd7 24. Rb3 cxb4 25. Bxb4 Ba7 ?!
This bishop retreat to the queenside earn black's an inferior position. Probably the bishop should reside along the a1-h8 diaganol so 25... Be5 is probably the correct move 26. Rf3 Nb5 27. Qd3 Bb6 28. Rf4 Qa7 29. Bd2 Kg7 30. a4 Nc7 31. Bc3+ 31. Rh4 Is an alternative for e.g 31... h5 32. g4 Rh8 31...f6 32. Rg4 g5 33. h4 1-0
It seems that black resign too early. The material is still balance but if we look deeper, majority of White's piece is heading toward black vulnerable kingside whereas black's piece is somehow "off side" at the queenside. Play might continued for e.g 33...Kf7 34. Rg3! giving way for his queen to enter black's kingside position via d1-h5 Ke8 (34... gxh4 35. Rh3) 35. Qd1 Kd7 36. Qg4+ Kd8 37. Qh5 and black is on the edge of disaster. 
1 comment:
I do agree with hairulov analysis, black's black square bishop seem misplaced at a7 , it should be placed along a1-h8 diagonal for both defence and assist black queen side attack.
Post a Comment